India Tourism Development Corporation Ltd (ITDC) approved its unaudited standalone and consolidated financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2026, according to a BSE filing submitted on August 10, 2026. The ITDC Q1 results were reviewed by the Audit Committee before receiving approval from the company’s Board of Directors at its meeting held on Monday.

The public-sector tourism company submitted the financial statements in the prescribed format under Regulation 33 of the SEBI Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements Regulations, 2015. The filing also included the auditors’ reports on the standalone and consolidated results.

The Board meeting began at 4 pm and concluded at 6.30 pm. ITDC’s filing was signed by Company Secretary VK Jain and addressed to the listing departments of BSE and the National Stock Exchange of India.

Auditor highlights licence fee invoicing matter

In its limited review report on the standalone financial results, DSG & Associates drew attention to a licence fee matter. According to the disclosed extract, ITDC had not generated invoices for licence fees payable by licensees at The Ashok Hotel, Hotel Samrat and Taj Restaurant, involving Rs 1,292.59 lakh.

The extract identifies this issue under the auditor’s “Emphasis of Matter” section. The supplied filing content ends before providing further details about the period, accounting treatment or any management response relating to the invoices. Accordingly, no additional conclusion on the financial effect can be drawn from the available disclosure.

The standalone statement was prepared using the recognition and measurement principles prescribed under Ind AS 34, Interim Financial Reporting, along with applicable provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and accounting principles generally accepted in India.

Scope of the limited review

The auditor said its review was conducted in accordance with Standard on Review Engagements 2410 issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. A limited review primarily involves inquiries of company personnel and analytical procedures and provides less assurance than an audit; the auditor therefore did not express an audit opinion.

Subject to the matters referenced in the report, the auditor stated that nothing had come to its attention indicating that the standalone statement was not prepared under the applicable Indian Accounting Standards or that it failed to disclose information required under Regulation 33. The available filing extract refers to exceptions described in paragraphs five and six, but does not reproduce the complete text of those matters.

Source: BSE corporate announcement.